http://www.painquotidien.com/
That's a great idea for a restaurant- good tasting, organic breads with simple ingredients combined with communal tables so you meet people. Someone should open one up on California Avenue next to a smoothie shop. That'd be a perfect combination.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Vegan Athletes Accel
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=keri/080616&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab6pos2
Even a 246 lbs. Hall of Fame tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs thinks you can play at the highest levels with a vegan diet.
Even a 246 lbs. Hall of Fame tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs thinks you can play at the highest levels with a vegan diet.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Gandhi: All Men are Brothers (Autobiographical Reflections)
"'Earn thy bread by the sweat of thy brow' says the Bible. Sacrifices may be of many kinds. One of them may well be bread labour. If all laboured for their bread and no more, then there would be enough food and enough leisure for all."
"Indeed at the root of this doctrine of equal distribution must lie that of trusteeship of the wealthy for superfluous wealth possessed by them. For according to the doctrine they may not possess a rupee more than their neighbours. How is this to be brought about? Nonviolently? Or should the wealthy be dispossessed of their possessions? To do this we would naturally have to resort to violence. This violent action cannot benefit the society. Society will be the poorer, for it will lose the gifts of a man who knows how to accumulate wealth. Therefore the nonviolent way is evidently superior. The rich man will be left in possession of his wealth, of which he will use what he reasonably requires for his personal needs and will act as a trustee for the remainder to be used for the society. In this argument honesty on the part of the trustee is assumed."
"Indeed at the root of this doctrine of equal distribution must lie that of trusteeship of the wealthy for superfluous wealth possessed by them. For according to the doctrine they may not possess a rupee more than their neighbours. How is this to be brought about? Nonviolently? Or should the wealthy be dispossessed of their possessions? To do this we would naturally have to resort to violence. This violent action cannot benefit the society. Society will be the poorer, for it will lose the gifts of a man who knows how to accumulate wealth. Therefore the nonviolent way is evidently superior. The rich man will be left in possession of his wealth, of which he will use what he reasonably requires for his personal needs and will act as a trustee for the remainder to be used for the society. In this argument honesty on the part of the trustee is assumed."
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Friday, May 30, 2008
Monday, May 26, 2008
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)